Talk:Keefe, Bruyette & Woods

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fair use rationale for Image:Kbw logo.gif[edit]

Image:Kbw logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keefe, Bruyette & Woods[edit]

why this short article is of questionable neutrality?

Lamro (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to read about the James McDermott insider trading scandal . . . . . and nothing here. Nothing at all. Zip. Zilch. Stink. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.6.52 (talk) 08:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Controversy Section[edit]

The only content under the controversy section was from 1999--twenty+ years ago. The only source for the section was a permanently dead link. The controversy was also apparently inconsequential: it said the firm paid $75,000 to resolve it, which is a really small sum of money for these firms. Two sentences isn't enough to justify an entire subsection, and the particular event isn't notable enough to be included in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImVeryAwesome (talk • contribs) 01:49, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]