Talk:Keizer Ghidorah

Keizer Ghidorah is NOT King Ghidorah!

What is it with you people? Keizer Ghidorah is not King Ghidorah. Just because he has Ghidorah on the last part of his name doesn't mean he's King Ghidorah. Death Ghidorah has Ghidorah in the name but not King Ghidorah. Why don't you people understand? Don't redirect the page again. --Naruto134 00:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

WHY DO OU KEEP REDIRECTING THIS PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T DO IT AGAIN. --Shredderman38 04:38, 23 July 2007

Apelinq, if your thinking about redirecting this page, forget about it. Is there proof that Toho considers Keizer Ghidorah a form of KG? Exactly, that's what I thought. --Naruto134 00:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

You mindless fan boys have no proof that he is a different creature, maybe go and ask somebody that knows what their talking about instead of hanging asking on fan message boards. You should have asked the guy I told you too go ask, seems you were too lazy to do it. --CLS 18:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Be civil. And here's your proof. And also, at the back of the DVD box of Final Wars they show the logo "Monster X II". Now your YOU show me proof he's King Ghidorah. --Naruto134 00:00, August 17 2007 (UTC)

Fan made websites do not counts as proof. The Monster X II logo is the same as the King Ghidorah logo, so that is moot. I tell you go go ask any one person that operates Sci Fi Japan but you fail to show you have done it. --CLS 19:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Enough of this vandalism. Repeat this redirecting again and I will have an admin block you. Monster X II is not King Ghidorah's. If it was King Ghidorah, they would put King Ghidorah instead of Monster X II on the logo. Face it, I'm right and you're wrong. Don't get emotional that your wrong. And don't think what I'm doing is vandalism because undoing is not vandalism. --Naruto134 00:00, August 17 2007 (UTC)

You accuse me of vandalism when your getting bots making warnings on edits you've made, and making childish threats. You've failed to prove outside of fan websites on the creature's status .--CLS 20:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Merge?

I have restored the textual version, as the redirect did not work (the link is defective). It seems that what is being attempted is really a merge with another article. Please follow the procedure set out in Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Proposing_a_merger and attempt to reach an agreement. Edit warring will not be productive, nor will the use of invective in discussions. Kablammo 20:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

It was agreed long ago that this article was unnecessary , and the King Ghidorah article was to be used instead, but some users here keep ignoring the talk page for that article.--CLS 21:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)