Talk:Kelvedon

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Small or Large Village

This article says both. It is certainly home to more people than nearby Coggeshall.

What should it be? Yyem 13:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can it not be both? For example, a large piece of sand is both large (within the context of grains of sand) and small (within the context of other named physical things like clumps of toilet role) at the same time. Hence the joke: What is large and small at the same time? A big piece of sand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.59.199.204 (talk) 12:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvedon Today[edit]

This whole paragraph needs rewriting in a neutral format, and with citations to back the claims being made. Unless some of the claims are cited, they should be removed, as they could well be libellous. Skinsmoke (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]