Talk:Kepler-10c/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found with this article:

"In January 2011, some four months prior" prior to the discovery? It's mentioned in the lead but starting off with that's still a bit odd, I'd just remove the 4 months part.
- It still felt awkward after removing the 4 months portion, so I nixed the whole phrase. How does it look? --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"allowed the Kepler team to rule out the majority alternatives" majority of the alternatives
- Done --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
link triple star system.
- Done --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per MoS, don't have Ref #4's title in all-caps.
- All set. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put the article on hold and pass when the issues are fixed. Should only take like 5 minutes to modify so nothing big. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 01:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.