Talk:Kevin Padian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


DI's Wells claims[edit]

What Padian & Gishlick wrote was the following (full paragraph):

Wells wrote a theological dissertation at Yale on

the “Argument to Design” and how Darwin allegedly mistook it. He then received a PhD in Molecular and Cell Biology at Berkeley on the effect of gravitation on the 8-cell embryo; two multiauthored papers were produced from that laboratory’s work. He followed this with a 5-year postdoctoral position sponsored by a retired professor in the same department at Berkeley, during which time he seems to have performed no experiments and to have received no grant support from his sponsor. He was simultaneously a “postdoc” at the antievolutionary Discovery Institute in Seattle, where he remains. No peer-reviewed publications resulted from Wells’s 5-year stint, but Icons of Evolution appeared shortly after its term limit expired. Antievolutionists hope that Wells’s apparent academic credentials will help establish him as the new “inside expert” on the scientific shortcomings of evolution, a role Wells encourages. The book jacket to Icons of Evolution features congratulatory blurbs from Wells’s fellows at the Discovery Institute (without identifying them as such), including Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, and

William Dembski. [My emphasis]

Given that Wells was only awarded his doctorate in 1994, it is not unreasonable to assume that the two papers Larabell is talking about were the two Padian & Gishlick explicitly mentioned. Certainly to make the accusation of "misrepresentation" stick, it needs to be proved that these were not the same papers. HrafnTalkStalk 09:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This could be. I have to do some mroe research (of the dispute and wikipedia policy). TableMannersC·U·T 05:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Padian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]