Talk:Kevin Poulsen

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Kevin Poulsen. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Kevin Poulsen at the Reference desk.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Porsche[edit]

If I recall correctly, Poulsen never actually received ownership of a Porsche, because he failed to realize that the people at the station might notice that all 102 callers had the voice of the same kid, so I've added a CN tag to the incident. The event definitely happened, I remember it being a topic of discussion among other like-minded people who lived in the city of Camarillo, but the way it reads on the page now strongly implies he actually got the car, and I remember this event being brought up as one of the examples of how raw greed often results in a persons downfall when it comes to this sort of thing... Zaphraud (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flashing GIFs[edit]

The placement and odd wording of this sentence suggests that he himself posted these gifs, when in fact he condemns it. what exactly is the point of this sentence anyway? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.255.201.211 (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree. The sentence is so misleading that I'm going to remove it without any further discussion. R0m23 (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to suggest that the flashing GIF sentence, which has returned, might benefit from review. The reference seems meant to highlight my use of the word "hackers" in the headline of a 2008 article I wrote about the epilepsy forum attack. I suspect the contributor believes the headline was inapt, and thus provides some unstated encyclopedic insight on my character. But the current placement and phrasing could easily mislead a reader into thinking I staged the attack, rather than reporting on it. Klpoulsen (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid invading privacy of non-notable persons.[edit]

First of why I did a double undo: I have once again removed the name of the person mentioned in the linked article, as it is my opinion that the exclusion is the conservative solution to this. An inclusion should follow if we can reach some understanding to why it should be included. His name is easily available for an interested person, either through the linked article, or through these logs, which clearly indicates what happened "Avoid mentioning names", so the exclusion is not particularly effective at hiding his name either. It is a paradox that writing this text might even emphasize it further.

The reason for doing it in the first place: We should avoid mentioning names of people which are not notable. The mentioning of the name neither adds to the article, nor is the person himself particularly notable. If he was, we should be able to create an article about him. I agree that it is interesting that Poulsen contributed to the apprehension, and that passage is kept intact. It disturbs me however that we put a name of a third party here without any necessity. Think about it as an extra-marital affair, if we found for some reason the extramarital affair of someone to be "newsworthy", would we necessarily mention the name of whom he/she did it with? - If the question is yes, then it should be included, otherwise no.

Conclusion, in lack of knowledge of more specific policies, I suggest the non-notable rule should apply here. Bfg (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He is a criminal. To censor his name because you feel you have to protect him is not a valid reason. It adds more detail to the article subject: A pedophile was caught though the means of Kevin Poulsen's actions. And the point about him not being notable is not valid, If anything BECAUSE he was caught by Poulsen makes him notable. -- Esemono (talk) 08:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it's the policy of Wikipedia to never mention a name that hasn't been adjudicated notable. The name has previously been restored to the article by another user, and correctly so in my estimation. We'd have a slim encyclopedia if we never discussed the non-notable universe relevant to notable topics.

— Adrian~enwiki (talk) 09:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ethics[edit]

Kevin along with Adrian Lamo revealed Bradley Manning as being the potential source of the Wikileaks released Collateral murder video. It calls journalist ethics into question revealing sources. -- 94.194.60.19 (talk) 00:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has now also been revealed that prior to Bradley Manning being 'outted' he was offered journalist source protection. Kevin Poulsen/Wired is accused of removing this from the chat logs that have been released. http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/18/wikileaks/index.html -- 217.205.225.251 (talk) 10:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps these points would fit better in the Adrian Lamo article? In any case, I added a brief mention of Poulsen's connection to the story.Beautiful tau day (talk) 23:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Poulsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Poulsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Beast Article[edit]

How do we go about describing his recently published article on The Daily Beast? FunksBrother (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Computer program[edit]

According to an update on Unsolved Mysteries (Season 3, Episode 4, 45:32), after his time in prison, he "created a program for law enforcement officials that located over 700 registered sex offenders." This seems to conflict with the information currently in the article.--WizWheatly (ftaghn) 20:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the app you use to hac[edit]

App 41.216.201.132 (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]