Talk:Key Code Qualifier

Is it possible somone could add a link to a complete list of Sense Key/ASC/ASCQ codes. A lot of places seem to have partial lists and it would be a very useful resource.

The complete list is given in the SPC-4 spec. You can get the last draft from ftp.t10.org. --Ste.Ri 16:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

195.212.29.83 (talk) 17:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC) KCQ's with C>127 or Q>127 are vendor unique (see the last few lines of table C.1 in spc4r11.pdf on ftp.t10.org), but a few of these have crept into the table. A complete list that includes all KCQ's from all vendors would be a REALLY useful resource, and would probably require multiple decodes in the hopefully occasional case where two vendors happen to have used the same KCQ combination to signify different errors. A vendor column would then also be required.[reply]

The standard K's: http://www.t10.org/lists/2sensekey.htm

The standard CQ's: http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm

All part of 'SCSI Common Codes & Values' at: http://www.t10.org/lists/1spc-lst.htm

--T10fan (talk) 03:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the sources?[edit]

Unless someone can provide an official source for the term "key code qualifier" and the claim that "all three fields are usually logically combined into a 20 bit field", I think this article should be deleted. I can't find any mention of the term in the SAM or SPC documents and most of the Google results simply link back to this article. Furthermore, the Sense Key and ASC/ASCQ fields are separate and may appear in any combination, which means there is no reason to treat them as a single value. 198.45.199.90 (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't confirm the term "key code qualifier", nor can I confirm "usually" combined. However, §2.4.1.6 Additional Sense and Additional Sense Qualifier codes of Segate's SCSI Commands Reference Manual does group ASC/ASCQ with the sense key, albeit not in a way that exactly matches. --Pokechu22 (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]