Talk:Khalid Amayreh

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Statements on Jews[edit]

I fail to see why this material has been removed. The source is an interview Amayreh gave that was broadcast on Iran's Press TY (as translated by MEMRI). An interview with a national news network is certainly notable and his statements regarding "Zionist Jews" are also notable (yes, they may not portray Amayreh in a positive light, but that alone is not a reason to remove it). As for the claim that the translation is inaccurate, please cite a source to indicate this. It is true that of the thousands of translation MEMRI has done over the last decade, less than a dozen have been questioned as being inaccurate (by sources which themselves aren't exactly neutral). To claim (or imply) that all MEMRI translations are suspect is a little disingenuous.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Where in guidelines does it say an interview on national news is notable? I've raised a discussion at WP:BLPN because this pertains wider WP:BLP issues of WP:UNDUE, WP:RS, and probably even WP:COAT. JFHJr (㊟) 02:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would think that an interview on a national television news broadcast is notable, but you are free to disagree with me. As for your other claims, I will again ask you to cite a source to support your claim that the translation is inaccurate.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

To preempt further conflicts, I am considering adding material from this article written by Amayreh himself, in which he agrees with Helen Thomas that Jews of European ancestry should be expelled from Palestine and that "Israel can be and should be compared with Nazi Germany." I welcome any comments or concerns.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Actually, this is a self-published source, so its probably not appropriate for a BLP article unless it is cited in an independent RS.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 02:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Quotes from interviews from WP:RS generally are acceptable if in context - since comments on this topic often taken out of context to appear more controversial than they may in fact be. And quotes should not just emphasizing some one point for some POV reason while ignoring what may be more major points to the interviewee or the subject. However, they also should not be the main point of the article about the subject. Therefore anyone adding them to this article also should look at new refs below to give a broader picture of the individual. CarolMooreDC 16:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New refs need adding[edit]

From the deletion discussion via Sean Hoyland: I think it's probably reasonable to consider Ma'an News Agency (see their about us page) as a reliable source when it comes to Palestinian journalists, and they refer to him as 'Prominent Palestinian journalist Khalid Amayreh' here. Human Rights Watch have a section about him in their No News is Good News report (pp21-22) (with secondary source coverage by AP/Guardian here). CarolMooreDC 15:57, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]