Talk:Khushbu Sundar/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The logic of Kushboo's talk

Well This is about the recent issue that has been burning in Tamil Nadu, for what Kushboo said about Pre-Marietal sex. Here are my views.

Kushboo's views were basically interpreted wrongly. Kushboo was NOT wrong in my opinion. And she didn’t say anything against Tamil/Indian culture. Though I can explain in depth, the summary will only be the following,

  • Kushboo meant to have sex with multiple persons. And she only has said pre-marietal sex is wrong with the loving partner
  • Marriage is NOT the requirement for having sex, because, sex is the extremity of love as evident from Thirukural, Agathinai Padalgal [supposed to be the mirror of Tamil culture beyond any question], which were written 2000+ years back.
  • Marriage is ONLY a social formality, to announce the society that the concerned couple will be together. Announcement is different from asking permission. I strongly believe that bondage due to "love" between the couple is stronger/persistent/ever lasting than bondage due to "social formality" such as marriage.
  • Virginity [in my opinion] is NOT LOST even if you have pre-marietal sex with your partner. Virginity is by heart.
  • Virginity is common for both boy and girl. When a boy is not virgin, he has no right to expect his partner as virgin.


Peace

[RAJ] <r@rajkumar.in>



The public was vehemently against such moral policing. Tamil Nadu has been one of the most forward states in India about women rights and rationalist thinking.



The above two lines have been REMOVED. There is no proof for the first, and the second sentence in my opinion, with due respect is hogwash. What evidence can presented for this, I can cite many examples to prove how TN has been BACKWARD as far as women are concerned. I think still think in no way could TN be called a forward as far as gender-equality is concerned.

Temple

i'm gonna remove the reference to a temple built for her. check out this Link If somebody can provide any reference of its existence please do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vij4yd (talkcontribs) 09:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 4 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


KushbooKhushbu Sundar – This spelling is used by her own Twitter and they seem about equally common in Google search results. I don't see a good reason for a mononym here. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

  • Support - Per nom as well as we have referneces talking about Khushbu Sundar 1. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:15, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Nakhat Khan vs Khushbu Sundar

I'm still unclear on how we're supposed to present the subject's birth name and public name. This interview from The News Minute includes language from the subject that's so confusing, that it is unclear what name she held at birth:

'my name has been Khushbu right from the age of seven since I was a child actor' ... Khusbhu explains that right from her passport to identity documents, her name is Khushbu alias Nakhat Khan ... 'it’s been Khushbu Sundar for the past 18 years and prior to that, since I was 7 or 8 years old, it has always been Khusbhu ... My family calls me Nakhat, my school friends and teachers call me Nakhat ... I am very proud to have my name as Nakhat Khan, I have never changed it ... Nakhat means Khusbu which is fragrance ... My name is Khusbu Sundar. And yes, my name is Nakhat. What’s your problem?'

So, she was born Nakhat Khan, but when she was 7 she started going by Khushbu, and then when she got married she added the Sundar? So do we she was born Nakhat Khan, wouldn't that belong in the lead? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 4 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Khushbu. (non-admin closure) signed, Iflaq (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)



Khushbu SundarKhushbu – Ms Khushbu is known and credited mononymously and thus needs to be assigned as the primary subject of Khushbu. The now Khushbu title is assigned to a poetry volume that has 500 views as opposed to the actor's ~100k views. There can be no dispute regarding notability https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1001243/ AppuSunkad (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC) AppuSunkad (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.