Talk:Kienzle Uhren

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comments[edit]

Why writing the name in capitals all the time? Some sections (esp sections Corporate philosophy and Watch collection) sound like an advertisement, but this seems to be supported by the source (Lehmhaus, Schmidt and Welchering), although I had not checked the source yet and AGF. Sebastian scha. (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the capitalization of the brand title does nothing for the article's readability. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No website?[edit]

The website link has been pointed out by an IP caught in a rangeblock as being dead. I've tagged it as it doesn't work for me either. I've done a search, and I can't find a website for the company - just lots of people selling the watches. I can't find any evidence that the company has closed, but nothing that looks particularly reliable to say they're still going. I presume they still are going - can anyone find anything out on this? Peridon (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to Watch-Wiki the company went insolvent in 2010, restructured and went insolvent again in 2014: https://watch-wiki.org/index.php?title=KIENZLE_Uhren_GmbH User:fazalmajid —Preceding undated comment added 09:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kienzle Uhren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kienzle Uhren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Slave labourer picture[edit]

What happened in the country in that period was disgusting and should never ever be denied. But this is an article about a watch company, not nazi attrocities. Possibly 100% of companies in nazi Germany could have been using slave labour, but I don't see it constantly mentioned when talking about every other German company, this is like highlighting one company above all others when they were all equally as bad, those that did it. Middle More Rider (talk) 19:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]