Talk:Killian documents authenticity issues

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Killian documents authenticity issues article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 90 days

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Bush family Low‑importance

	Killian documents authenticity issues is within the scope of WikiProject Bush family, a project dedicated to creating and improving content related to the Bush family. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bush familyWikipedia:WikiProject Bush familyTemplate:WikiProject Bush familyBush family articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Index 1, 2

Index

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

reference 18[edit]

Does not work. It should be, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18982-2004Sep13.html

Claustro123 (talk) 13:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right you are. I've fixed it. (I was probably the one who got it wrong in the first place.) Thanks, CWC 07:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

quotes. two characters or one[edit]

Your statement "Most typewriters of the era featured vertical apostrophes, rather than angled or curved ones". should acknowledge that no typewriters ever used 2 symbols for opening and closing quotes. This is due to the inability of the typewriter to have the intelligence to separate opening from closing quotes. This is a simple matter for computers.

see: https://typographyforlawyers.com/straight-and-curly-quotes.html

Claustro123 (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]