Talk:Kilmarnock and Loudoun (UK Parliament constituency)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Possible Minor Change of Constituency Name in 2005[edit]

[1] is a link to The Parliamentary Constituencies (Scotland) Order 2005 on an official government website. This is the legal instrument which gives effect to the Boundary Commission for Scotland's fifth general review and defines the current Scottish UK Parliamentary constituencies.

The Order spells 'Loudoun' as 'Loudon'. If that spelling is the same in the official hardcopy version of the order then that is part of the official title of the constituency even if it is a spelling mistake and not an accepted variation in spelling. I do not have any local knowledge of the area, so I am unable to say which option is correct.

If 'Loudoun' is the only accepted spelling in the area, then the discrepancy I have identified may not matter much, but I will do a re-direct from 'Kilmarnock and Loudon (UK Parliament constituency)' to avoid anyone working from the name in the order being comfused in the future. --Gary J 12:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kilmarnock and Loudoun (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831075116/http://www.kilmarnockandloudoun.co.uk/ to http://www.kilmarnockandloudoun.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]