Talk:Kim Geybels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Privacy question[edit]

I did found a reliable source (in Dutch) and another one (in Dutch) that her traveling companion in Thailand was married (with strong rumors that he and Geybels where involved in a love affair) at the time and was a former junkie (at the time). Is this information newsworthy to put into the article? Or is it an invasion of privacy? — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 17:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a attempt to smear her image by the way, I actually liked her... — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 18:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this is relevant... But if you do want to include this, you should add that Geybels indicated that this love affair was over before going to Thailand.[1] (in Dutch) (forgot to sign)--Btsz (talk) 22:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you (it does not look relevant), besides it's getting harder to see in this controversy what actually happened and what is interpretation by journalists (a.k.a. what happened according to journalists). — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 22:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Might be future references...[edit]

Geybels naar rechter als ontslag geldig is (in Dutch) (23-9-'10) + Kim Geybels (N-VA) is geen senator meer (in Dutch) (24-9-'10). — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 17:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

+ Halfrond in Senaat hermetisch afgesloten om Kim Geybels (in Dutch) (12-10-'10) — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 17:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Geybels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]