Talk:Kim Seol-hyun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Importance[edit]

I have referred this issue to WikiProject Korea at the link provided below. Please don't edit until the issue is resolved. 78.146.137.190 (talk) 23:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Korea/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment where is listed as #2 as of the time of writing (02/04/2016)

Her importance is mid at best; certainly not high. Random86 (talk) 23:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The criteria for high reads "Subject has a wide range of notability. Includes individuals and topics with a very high international profile, primary administrative divisions, keystone articles for major categories." Let's take a look at that.
  • Wide range of notability: She is a famous musician, actress, and celebrity. checkY
  • Very high international profile: She is world famous. checkY
  • Primary administrative divisions: I can understand this argument ☒N
  • Keystone articles for major categories: I can understand this argument. ☒N

78.146.137.190 (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I could maybe understand mid-importance, because you can argue she is "notable within [her] particular field". Celebrities with more (or, at least equal) notability, such as Kim Tae-yeon and Bae Suzy are mid-importance. Seolhyun does not have a "very high international profile" like Ban Ki-moon (the example given). Even Lee Min-ho is currently rated as low-importance. Idols/singers/actors are usually rated low or mid-importance. Random86 (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've reassessed it as mid-importance; she is notable within this particular field and is a higher-profile individual (as contrasted with lower-profile individuals). – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 15:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

At the time of writing the image is currently is of Seolhyun at a fansigning event. This is only consistent with the Malaysian Wiki. Should we change the image to make it more consistent with the other language wikis? Or could we include the other images elsewhere to make the article more informative? 78.148.65.71 (talk) 10:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to see other images available you can look here. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Kim_Seol-hyun?uselang=en 78.148.65.71 (talk) 15:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

I mistakenly wrote (Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at fr:Seolhyun; see its history for attribution.) at revision 713196341 can someone please change it to (Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at ko:Seolhyun; see its history for attribution.) 78.148.65.71 (talk) 15:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can't change edit summaries. Random86 (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you can. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_summary#Changing_an_edit_summary 89.242.129.234 (talk) 12:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Seol-hyun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]