Talk:Kinetochore

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Pronunciation[edit]

How do you pronounce this?!? 71.225.47.199 (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I don't know, I'll have to look it up myself. --99.157.108.248 (talk) 17:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I heard that in Mitosis and Meiosis-II (where sister chromatids rather than homologs are separated), the correct attachment of microtubules to the kinetochors is termed "amphitelic", whereas in Meiosis-I it is called "bi-oriented". Other abnormal orientations are "monotelic", "syntelic" and mono-oriented (a.k.a. co-oriented). Monotelic means that one single kinetochor is pulled to either side (torn apart), syntelic means that two sister chromatids are pulled to one side and mono-oriented means that both sister chromatid pairs (that is, the whole bivalent) is pulled to one side. But I don't have any citations, no time for search, sorry Ryu (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replace picture?[edit]

The first picture shown in the article only gives us little dots. We can’t even see up close what it looks like. In my opinion, it does not give a good enough image, and if seen improperly, may actually be misleading. I’d say we replace the picture with a better one. Senomo Drines (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]