Talk:King's Consent

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Different to Royal Assent[edit]

Please don't merge article in to Royal Assent article this is a different concept.

John Cross (talk) 07:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pamphlet on Royal consent legislation published[edit]

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/79352/QC_PC_pamphlet_191212.pdf http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/pamphlet-on-royal-consent-legislation-published-8452548.html http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/QC_PC_pamphlet_191212.pdf http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills Kaihsu (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to City Remembrancer[edit]

Queen's Consent seems similar to the powers of the City Remembrancer in terms of an institution with a veto over laws. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.63.188 (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's consent and Equality Act[edit]

Citation for the article: "Buckingham Palace banned ethnic minorities from office roles, papers reveal". The Guardian. 2 June 2021. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 16:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed[edit]

This is going to be deleted until an adequate citation to support this inference in the dependent clause is supplied: “There is evidence of consent first being invoked in 1728 when George II gave parliament permission to debate the Suppression of Piracy bill, which suggests that it has been part of the UK legislative process for several hundred years.” 2600:8801:802B:CC00:8D3D:8B06:3536:F2BE (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page 9 of the cited reference. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]