Talk:King Albert Park MRT station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello?you can add a picture to the web[edit]

Hey!where is the photo of this station?just the location is it?! 

Arvin2323 (talk) 11:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Albert Park MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:King Albert Park MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HoHo3143 (talk · contribs) 09:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I will be your reviewer for this article. This is my first review, and after recently promoting the Level Crossing Removal Project article to GA status, I'll repay the favour of another wikipedia user by reviewing this article! Expect to see my comments soon. HoHo3143 (talk) 09:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article criteria[edit]

Well written[edit]

  • I have gone through and made some minor edits focusing on spelling and grammatical changes. HoHo3143 (talk) 2:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Verifiable with no original research[edit]

  • Everything is verifiable with no original research or copyright violations (I've done a plagiarism checker and it came back all good). HoHo3143 (talk) 1:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Broad in its coverage[edit]

  • The length, coverage, and detail of the article is appropriate. In the future the cross island line section of the history will need to be expanded once construction begins (just to keep in mind for any future readers). HoHo3143 (talk) 1:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

  • The article is written in a neutral manor. HoHo3143 (talk) 1:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Stable[edit]

  • Article is stable with no disputes. HoHo3143 (talk) 1:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible[edit]

  • Alt text should be added to all images. HoHo3143 (talk) 1:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
    • I've checked the ALT text and it's all good- will upgrade to GA now. Congratulations! HoHo3143 (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • All other images are high quality, related to the topic, and have no copyright issues. HoHo3143 (talk) 1:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

General[edit]

  • You've done a really great job with this article! Once you fix up the recommendations regarding the illustration criteria then I would be happy to certify the article and promote it to Good Article status! HoHo3143 (talk) 2:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Added alt to images as requested! ZKang123 (talk) 06:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've gone and updated the article status to Good Article. Congratulations! Thank you for producing great articles for wikipedia and I've enjoyed working with you. HoHo3143 (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:49, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by ZKang123 (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 21:34, 21 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is long enough and was promoted to GA on 19 Dec, looks fully sourced, including hook fact, and the hook is interesting (I prefer ALT0). Earwig looks good and QPQ is done. Good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was it named after the former king of Belgium?[edit]

Where did the name come from? 2A02:1810:1D20:CA00:ED59:1A5E:B182:14E4 (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:King_Albert_Park_MRT_station&oldid=1203295347"