Talk:Kingdom of Lithuania (1918)

A fact from Kingdom of Lithuania (1918) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that German nobleman Wilhelm, 2nd Duke of Urach, was elected King of Lithuania, but never visited that country?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Review comments: Renata (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appendix titles[edit]

Despite the fact that it is not a strict requirement (see WP:FNNR), I'd suggest we follow the following convention: "Notes" for the explanatory material and "Citations" for the citations. A good practice in Wikipedia is that sections should not bear confusingly similar titles: my rationale is that 'footnotes' and 'notes' are confusingly similar to each other. I would like to stress that my proposal is not about exercising any kind of misplaced consistency. It's a proposal towards less confusing conventions in a specific series of articles. --Omnipaedista (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingdom of Lithuania (1918). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080303191252/http://mkp.emokykla.lt/gimtoji/ to http://mkp.emokykla.lt/gimtoji/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the flag[edit]

Pinging all involved users: User:Sabbatino, User:Лобачев Владимир, User:Samhanin. The flag that Samhanin adds is perfectly justified - in the article, there is the photo of the Vilnius Conference in 1917, where the flag is used. The Wiki article also has the same photo but larger that also includes the flag, which Samhanin made into a rather good-looking SVG file. As for the colours, they are the ones that have always been used. I suggest we keep the flag.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]