Talk:Kings Mountain, California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sierra Morena link issue[edit]

The link to Sierra Morena is less than helpful, since there is exactly one sentence in that article that pertains to the Sierra Morena in San Mateo county - and all it says is that the name also applies to the highest point in San Mateo county.

Either the Sierra Morena article should be disambiguated, if there is more to say about the San Mateo Sierra Morena, or the link from this article and the extra sentence in the target article removed.

Nsayer 21:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

High Point[edit]

The high point in San Mateo County is not at Sierra Morena. The link to Sierra Morena says that it is the highest point on Kings Mountain not the highest point in the county.

The high point in San Mateo County is Long Ridge which is south of Kings Mountain. It has an elevation of 2,620 ft. It is on private property and is not open to the public.

The entire section titled High Point should be removed.

Blair196 (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kings Mountain, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]