Talk:Knik Arm ferry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

update[edit]

I haven't heard anything about this in a while, but this article is out of date. Anyone know anything more recent than "might sail by 2008"? Beeblebrox (talk) 03:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've updated the article, but the information I found is almost a year old. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Knik Arm ferry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

split?[edit]

The topic of this article is the Knik Arm ferry. That story is basically over, at least for the foreseeable future, but the M/V Susitna still exists and is now renamed the M/V Amazing Grace, and it's story could go on for quite some time, so just putting it out there that a split might be a thing to consider. What I'm not sure on is naming conventions for articles on marine vessels that have been renamed. Do we split it under the original name and redirect the new name there, or split it under the new name and redirect the old name here, or something else? Beeblebrox (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any need for a split, unless or until signifiant content develops on the ship's new role. A redirect from MV Amazing Grace to the Red Cross section here would seem appropriate for now. Davidships (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]