Talk:Kodacolor (still photography)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal: Kodacolor (still photography) and Kodacolor-X?[edit]

Is there enough special about Kodacolor-X that warrants a separate article? Of course, it uses a different process to later (and possibly earlier) colour negative films using the brand. However, you could say the same about different versions of Kodachrome (e.g. K12, K14 process) and they don't have separate articles. I feel that the brand warrants its own page, but that one for each variant is too much. Any thoughts? Fourohfour 10:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merged; my reasons for not merging straight away were (on reflection) quite minor. Fourohfour 13:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kodacolor in South America[edit]

Kodacolor brand is used nowadays in Argentina (apparently Brazil too). It's a 100 ASA color negative film named simply Kodacolor 100. I'm not an expert in photography but a friend of mine who works for a photolab says it's extremely similar to the Kodak Gold 100 but at a lower price (so he supposes it's a "not-enough-quality"/"non-complaiant" film. If I recall correctly it appeared in Argentina at 2002 (because 2001 in Argentina was no fun after devaluation). It's a pity I can't find any specifications aside from shops which sell it. --FedericoMP (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generations and (no) relation to Kodak Gold[edit]

This Vuescan table[1] suggests that there have been far more generations of Kodacolor since 1977 (at least 5) *AND* that it wasn't Kodacolor that was later sold as Kodak Gold, but rather prints from both Gold and Kodacolor were only printed on the same paper at around Kodacolor Generation 4. Furthermore, these two links [2], [3] suggest that there have been even more than 5 generations of Kodacolor since 1977 and that today's Kodak ColorPlus 200 (as sold by Kodak Alaris) is really Kodacolor VR 200 Generation 8, due to the fact that while the boxes read Kodak ColorPlus 200, the cans inside read Kodacolor 200, and the processed negative strips read KODAK VR 200-8 on the edge.

Half an hour of googling for (non-outdated, non-crossprocessed) good scans of ColorPlus and VR 200 (especially the VR 200 PLUS version which seems to have been the last generation that still read VR 200 on the box) seem to confirm the strong resemblance on factors such as color palette, contrast, sharpness, and graininess between the two films, as well as that ColorPlus seems to have gotten a bad rep from the fact that many commercial labs will botch prints and CD scans from it, especially in regards on sharpness (many commercial prints and scans from ColorPlus look like somebody slapped an insane amount of median blur on them in Photoshop, while homemade scans from the same negs look alright) and sometimes also in color. --2003:71:4E6A:B427:C57C:4C29:7373:753B (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kodacolor (still photography). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kodacolor (still photography). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150328005106/http://www.photomemorabilia.co.uk/Colour_Darkroom/Early_Kodak.html to http://www.photomemorabilia.co.uk/Colour_Darkroom/Early_Kodak.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vericolor[edit]

Why is there no article on Vericolor, the professional version of Kodacolor? Specfically, I wanted to put a link on the VPL disambiguation page, but it was removed, as there is no article to link to. Gah4 (talk) 23:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]