Talk:Konta, Chhattisgarh

India: Chhattisgarh / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chhattisgarh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

On 4 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to [[Konta, Chhattisgarh]]. The result of the discussion was Moved.

Requested move 4 September 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 19:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Konta → Konta, Chhattisgarh
Konta (disambiguation) → Konta

– No primary topic, see pageviews Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and WP:NCIND. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Johanna is a PTM but gets many more views. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, a surname used to refer to a person is a legitimate ambiguous usage, it is not a mere partial title match per WP:PTM. Add a link only if the article's subject [...] could plausibly be referred to by essentially the same name as the disambiguated term in a sufficiently generic context People with the surname Konta are habitually referred to as "Konta", and we can observe the same usage in the article itself, the infobox image caption does it already. --Joy (talk) 14:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.