Talk:Kota Gelanggi

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Johor may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Stronger causation?[edit]

Could "The discovery of a temple known as Candi Bemban and several artifacts in the area have led to the belief of the existence of a government ..." be "The discovery of a temple known as Candi Bemban and several artifacts in the area support the belief of the existence of a government before the Hughdbrown (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Lost City'[edit]

Kota Gelangi as a 'lost city' should not be presented as fact. If evidence emerges then this article should be split, with the Pahang caves having a separate article. Pakbelang (talk) 01:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]