This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
well some of the info on the site is also from the company policy book, how do i source that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.116.194 (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC) --EditorTruth (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd stay away from company produced documents such as this. There may be copyright problems. Also if you are a former employee, you may have a WP:COI--RadioFan (talk) 15:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in general, independent reliable sources are preferred over self-published or non-independent sources. The company policy manual is definitely self-published. Now, self-published sources can be useful for the company timeline and some basic information, but any of the key claims (e.g., awards won) need verified with independent sources. —C.Fred (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh i understand much more now, I also see that some other people have edited it more completely, and to me it sounds more neutral now that i see the improvements from others from what i had it when i first created it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorTruth (talk • contribs) 04:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]