This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Merged to Kuokkala, Jyväskylä. Merge partly carried out as of now, will add the templates in a bit. This is my first time doing such a merge, so please feel free to check my work. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 16:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kuokkala (district of Jyväskylä) → ? – "Kuokkala (district of Jyväskylä)" is an awkward title. A more natural title would be "Kuokkala, Jyväskylä" but the problem is that this title is already taken by Kuokkala, Jyväskylä, a ward that the district belongs to. Would "Kuokkala (district)" be a better title? Should the ward also be moved and Kuokkala, Jyväskylä be made to a disambiguation page? JIP | Talk 00:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)— Relisting.Havelock Jones (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
support move to Kuokkala (district) and add a hat note to both seems like the best solution—blindlynx (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this two-sentence stub into Kuokkala, Jyväskylä along with Ristikivi, the other existing article about Kuokkala districts. Not everything needs a separate page (WP:NOPAGE) and those articles are more of photo albums than something deeply informative.No such user (talk) 09:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment by relister: this needs more discussion if consensus is to be reached. JIP, —blindlynx, what do you think about No such user's proposal? Havelock Jones (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.