Talk:Kupu

Looks like copyvio

Text of Wikipedia article is text of http://kupu.oscom.org/ .

Page says " ©2001-2006 OSCOM. Kupu Editor."

Since Kupu is open source it's possible that they wouldn't have a problem with this appearing on Wikipedia, but I don't know. Can anybody get in touch with OSCOM / Kupu development and get a yes/no? -- 201.78.233.162 14:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

As the main developer of Kupu these days, I believe I can say it is alright to use the excerpt from the website which appears here (although I guess it could also do with some updating). DuncanBooth 08:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Small updates made by one of the authors

Updated the text a bit, looks like this was originally copied from one of the (very old, and ad-like) text documents from the package. Removed some of the advertising, updated so it's more recent, too. As I'm not impartial, please review, I think I was factual enough, though... --JohnnydeBris (talk) 10:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kupu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051203105003/http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/kupu-dev to http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/kupu-dev

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kupu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110401133722/http://codespeak.net/pipermail/kupu-dev/2010-October/002341.html to http://codespeak.net/pipermail/kupu-dev/2010-October/002341.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)