Talk:L. K. Madigan/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 23:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no way that an article of 125 words can be considered to be broad, per GA criteria #3. I recognize that it is likely there is a paucity of coverage, as is common for less well-known authors, but if she is notable, there must be something more. JohnRussell, your account is old enough and has enough edits that you should have access to the resources of the Wikipedia Library, which gives editors in good standing access to a huge pile of newspaper and academic databases for free. I highly recommend checking it out - if Madigan is notable, there's likely some newspaper coverage of her there that will help you expand the article. At this stage, it has to be a quickfail as being too far from one of the most significant GACR.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.