Talk:L0phtCrack

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computer Security: Computing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

I moved this from the article page. While it might be of interest to some, it isn't appropriate for an article on LC5.

There is a good freeware alternative to L0phtcrack called LCP. [1]

-- Gaius Octavius | Talk 17:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur; there is also the box at the bottom of the page listing a number of different programs with this sort of purpose. That seems like a more appropriate place for mentions of other things. ("don't need to mention other software unless we can explain it better through comparison") 125.236.211.165 (talk) 13:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Credit where credit is due[edit]

The text of the article makes it seems as though l0phtcrack was developed by Mudge alone, when that is not the case - and this is even referenced in the side note. There were also, if I recall correctly, contributors from outside of l0pht. If no one can defend the current wording, I will be changing it to remove Mudge and replace it with "l0pht, with contributions from others". Bobkeyes (talk) 03:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated[edit]

It's now after the date mentioned at the bottom of the page, and lo and behold, the article's prediction was correct. Now what do we do? 125.236.211.165 (talk) 13:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]