Talk:LAGEOS

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brass vs depleted uranium[edit]

01aug2009, Makeyev (talk · contribs) replaced 'brass' to 'depleted uranium' [1]. I am not sure this is correct. You don't need uranium to get 400 kg from a 60 cm sphere. It is true that this ref speaks of 'depleted uranium', but this one or this one tells it is brass. Which is compatible with the weight and probably much easier to manufacture. (Deep impact's impactor was made of copper) -- Xofc (talk) 07:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did undo it. -- Xofc (talk) 16:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Xofc. I'll try to check up the fact (before your post I was shure that it's made of U).Makeyev (talk) 13:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What results reported[edit]

eg Can anyone confirm that LAGEOS results confirmed the Lense–Thirring precession to +/- 10% in 2004 as claimed by Gregs post in Gravity probe B results ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
LAGEOUS results are mentioned (with sources) in Gravity Probe B. - Rod57 (talk) 10:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message Image[edit]

Oddly, the Russian Wikipedia has a picture of the message plaque, which the English Wikipedia doesn't.

IE: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LAGEOS-FILE.png

Should it be included?

Youngwilliam (talk) 05:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who built them?[edit]

Reading over this article, I was surprised at the paucity of information about who built these satellites, how they were launched and who operates them. Wikipedia articles on just about all other spacecraft have information about who manufactured them, and exact launch dates and information about launch equipment (i.e. what booster was used). Here we are told only that LAGEOS 1 and 2 were launched in 1976 and 1992, respectively, and that LAGEOS 2 was launched aboard STS-52. That appears to be it. I think at the least this article could be flagged for needing improvement (I do not know how to do that, as I am a bit of a newbie Wikipedia editor, but I have seen such flags appearing at the top of other articles). Arpd1234 (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't even mention that they are NASA satellites, and I would expect that information to be included in the introduction.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LAGEOS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to http://space.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/QuickLooks/lageosQL.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information missing for LAGEOS-2[edit]

For balance, and also for the sake of completeness, there are two pieces of information missing with regards to LAGEOS-2:

Does it also carry the time capsule plaque described for LAGEOS-1?
What is its expected lifetime? Is it expected to remain in orbit as long as the first one? 136.159.160.122 (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]