Talk:LGA 1155

Unnamed section

"Other specifications such as PCI Express lane, USB and SATA speed are the same as P55, H55 and H57 chipset." This may not be 100% accurate, since Sandy Bridge will use two 6GBps SATA ports, along with the other four 3GBps ports (at least on P67 and H67, H61 won't offer 6GBps). Reference: 83.134.49.141 (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

References

H77 chipset does not have legacy PCI support?

http://ark.intel.com/products/64018/Intel-BD82H77-PCH shows more information on just about every chipsets and H77 says PCI support is NO, meaning no legacy PCI support in this chip? I find motherboards having both H77 and legacy PCI use a seperate PCI-E to PCI bridge chip. The reference for "Intel® H77 Express Chipset: Product Brief", the only Legacy PCI I see is only in a H77 diagram, and I can't find a Product brief for all other chipsets. So is the Product Brief diagram wrong and ark.intel.com right? Sam6861 (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

An example of such a mainboard the iTE chip next to the TPM is such a bridge. http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4388#ov this is confirmed in the manual. http://ark.intel.com/products/64018/Intel-BD82H77-PCH states that the H77 does not support PCI. and datasheet does as well http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/chipsets/7-series-chipset-pch-datasheet.html. I made the change because a 988 page datasheet and countless OEMs spending money on a extra chip have much more weight then a diagram in a 2 or 3 page product brief. 24.57.178.36 (talk) 05:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

WTF with the "solution" to "systems" conversion?

Why the heck Mr. InternetMeme changes "solutions" to "systems"? No one in the whole world uses "cooling systems" or "external systems" in the context of desktop computers. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi there Mrs. Artem-S-Tashkinov. The word "solution" is used in relation to problems. External hardware is used in many contexts, including when something else has gone wrong. Most of the time that it is used, there is nothing wrong with anything, and it could only be described as a solution in a minority of cases. The word "hardware" is more general, and applies in all cases, whereas "external solutions" are only used when something has gone wrong. InternetMeme (talk) 11:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

People use wikipedia to find relevant information. 100% of computer retailers/shops/OEMs/news outlets use the word "cooling solution" - live with that or edit the article about butterflies. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 11:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what retailers call computer hardware, as Wikipedia is an entirely different entity, which uses a different style of language. Is English your first language, btw? InternetMeme (talk) 14:17, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Then go edit all other computer related articles and be banned from Wikipedia forever. Wikipedia is a source of relevant information, it's not your idealistic view of the world in classic English. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 19:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is both: It's a source of relevant information in proper English. I'm simply correcting the English, whilst slightly enhancing the information content. InternetMeme (talk) 16:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Fuck it, I give up. It's not my article and it's never been. Too bad it's now factually incorrect and misleading. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

How is it factually incorrect or misleading? I know a reasonable amount about installing processors and assosiated stuff, and I'm pretty good with language; and I've used words that I am very confident are accurate. If they're innacurate, then I'll change them; so if you can describe what's innacurate I'd be genuinely happy.

Is it this line "Motherboard manufacturers may use external hardware to add USB 3.0 support."? If that's not the solution to a lack of built-in USB support, then what is? An external circuit? An external chipset on the board? An external PCI-E card?

I used the term "hardware" because it describes all possible solutions to the problem. Saying "we solved the problem with a solution" is about as meaningful as saying "I'm annoyed because of a reason". If there's a reason, say what the reason is! If there's a solution to a problem, then say what the solution is! InternetMeme (talk) 20:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

SATA

SATA standards board requires SATA versions to be specified by speed rather then version. Seems that Wikipedia should comply just like vendors, though since Wikipedia doesn't require a license, it doesn't need to comply. So SATA 3Gbps and 6bps are the correct nomenclature not SATA 2.0 and 3.0. Danjw1 (talk) 02:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

what about memory overclocking?

I only see CPU and GPU overclocking stated...what about the memory? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.156.198.74 (talk) 09:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I added a section for PCI Support

I know the first two boards the P & H boards don't support them but I saw in the Intel Chipset main thread that some of the newer boards for 1155 Chipset have PCI support - Just didn't know which ones so I left the last three blank. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.90.226.20 (talk) 09:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Differences from 1156

What are the actual differences between LGA 1156 and LGA 1155, other than pin count? 75.149.36.241 (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

H61 and the RAM slots

What's up with H61 only supporting two RAM slots, yet I keep running across low(ish) end motherboards with 4 RAM slots in combination with the H61 !? This doesn't really make sense O.o
One example would be the Gigabyte H61M-D2H-USB3. http://www.gigabyte.com/fileupload/product/2/4004/5066_big.jpg
--84.62.137.222 (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

When four RAM sticks are installed on a H61 motherboard with four RAM slots, only single-sided RAM sticks can be used. Most H61 motherboards have only two RAM slots, and users can install double-sided RAM sticks into them. 222.165.42.62 (talk) 17:47, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Who said Sandybridge and Ivy bridge were 65nm?

I made SandyBridge 32nm, and Ivy Bridge 22nm, along with sources.

I made the sandybridge revision a while back, and somebody reverted it to 65nm, which it is NOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.56.167 (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Intel said that the chipsets in question are produced with a 65 nm lithography. You are confused between the chipset and processor lithographies. Please read the reference. All it takes is a click. Andrewrstevens (talk) 04:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

B75 support Intel vPro?

Does the Intel B75 chipset really support Intel vPro Technology? A check with Intel ark shows 'no'. And I think Intel Anti-Theft Technology support (and the relevant chipsets that support it) should be mentioned. 222.165.42.62 (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

On motherboards with four DIMM slots, only four single-sided DIMMs can be installed / DIMM speed?

Could this statement be confirmed and/or clarified, please? A quick google seems to show that this applies only to H61 chipset motherboards. Including on the [6] reference given.

i.e. Clarified that it only applies to H61 (never mind the given context of preceding sentence), or additional references given. [I'd sure like some, if only for my own information, myself.]

I have heard rumours of similar for my own Z68 chipset (1333, I believe, in this case), but been unable to independently confirm - thus my interest in the statement.

e.g. "* If four DDR3 1333 MHz memory modules are installed, the maximum memory speed will be limited to 1066" http://m.gigabyte.com/product/product.aspx?pid=3906

I would guess that these MB chipset blurbs are sourced out of Intel docs - references to those Intel docs would be appreciated, especially if any similar limitations apply to other chipsets.

Bs27975 (talk) 11:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Is this supposed to mean dual-ranked /single-ranked??? Memory rank User:ScotXW^t@lk 12:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Phasing out

Since here is stated his successor is lga 1150, have anyone idea/info in which time procesors will be stoped to be produced for these lga ? 88.102.84.189 (talk) 12:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Why include chipset specs?

This article is for the socket specifically, not the whole family of compatible chips and especially not for compatible chipsets. Why is all of this extra information in the article? Can it be removed? Alphachimera (talk) 01:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGA 1155. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713044342/http://download.intel.com/design/processor/designex/324644.pdf to http://download.intel.com/design/processor/designex/324644.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

NVMe

Does the NVM Express protocol have to be supported by the chipset or just by the firmware (i.e. BIOS/UEFI)? There is a "revision 1.0e" from January 23rd, 2013. User:ScotXW^t@lk 11:57, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

But Version 1.0 was released in 2011. NVMe uses MSI-X, but the Wikipedia article does not state whether it's optional or mandatory! MSI-X was specified with PCI 3.0 back in 2002. User:ScotXW^t@lk 12:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)