Talk:LGA 1366

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGA 1366 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Future of 1366[edit]

It seems like Intel promised the world with 1366 and led the enthusiast community to believe they would have a well supported socket with tons of future multi-core cpu releases (8 or 16 core). But as its turned out, very little was done and it seems like all the love from Intel went to the 1155/1156 platforms. [b]Will Intel be releasing any large number multi-core cpus for 1366 to complement the massive bandwidth provided by triple channel ram?[/b] History has shown, Intel brings out an Enthusiest platform like the dual socket Skulltrail, promises great things for it and then (like Onkyo's Upgradeable receivers) fall flat on future support or upgrade options.

My conclusion is obvious: Dont Buy to Intel's overpriced and under-supported Enthusiast platforms. Wait for the 2nd Generation of the mainstream version and then buy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.160.246 (talk) 21:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pin usage?[edit]

What is the actual pinout? What are the additional pins being used for as Intel migrates from LGA775? -- SpareSimian (talk) 11:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno what the actual pinout is (and it wouldn't surprise me if it's only availible under NDA) but the big change with 1366/1156 is the integration of the memory controller into the CPU and the replacement of the traditional FSB with either quickpath or direct PCIe and ESI links. Connecting multiple channels of DDR3 directly to the processor is going to take quite a lot of pins. 86.1.116.158 (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, we need to buy a new board for a new processor. then the socket goes obsolete. if i pay high for a mobo, and think to upgrade processor later. this is never be for next intel processor. only rich people could buy all parts expensive for future intel release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.137.48.5 (talk) 08:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mechanical load limits??[edit]

I went to this article because I wanted to understand what the LGA 1366 based architecture is and how it differs from older or competing architectures such as LGA 775 or LGA 1156. How is the "mechanical load limits" section of this article in any way useful or relevant? When you install a CPU and its heatsink / cooling fan, you push down until things "click" into place - push down too hard, you'll hear a sickening "crack" and then you go and buy a new one. The fact it breaks at 890 newtons is of no practical value to anyone. Also, due to differences in motherboard design and manufacturing materials and techniques, I doubt the figures quoted in this article are true of every LGA 1366 socket on the market.

I suggest it be left in for now, and an expert on the subject can discuss further whether they think it is relevant (or accurate) Besides which you'll find 90-95% of motherboards on the market (In Australia, at least) use the same (or very similar) manufacturing techniques/materials for motherboard (the actual board, not the circuit) and socket. 58.106.20.46 (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LGA 1366. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]