Talk:LG CU500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

There is no need to have 2 different articles. Why are there 2 in the 1st place? Not even every phone in general needs an article, let alone one for a phone & its tiny upgrade, from what I gather. Thoughts? hmwithτ 21:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'd say merge it since it's a firmware upgrade and not actually a separate model. Furthermore, it seems like the feature list from the CU500v page is a fairly in-depth and could add a lot more to this page as this page is barely more than only a few paragraphs longer than a stub.--Maikeru Go (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LG CU500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]