Talk:LaLa Ri/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Sources
@Wcohen2003: Please add sources for ALL claims on Wikipedia, otherwise the text will be removed. You've provided limited sourcing here so don't be surprised if the article is redirected until more sources can demonstrate notability. I suggest adding many more sources if you want the article to stick, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion
The performer is not notable enough on their own. The majority of the content in the page is about their performance on Drag Race (Wikipedia is not a Drag Race fansite). If this page is allowed, then every other contestant can have one. --78.148.25.46 (talk) 21:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- The question is whether LaLa Ri has done notable things outside RuPaul's Drag Race. It appears that she has, but I agree it is thin. Not a slam dunk, but at this point, leaning toward keeping.Naraht (talk) 12:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I read the article and there is no mention of notable things outside RPDR. The only project mentioned it's her single, which is hardly notable (it didn't chart) --78.148.25.46 (talk) 17:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop adding back the AfD template incorrectly. AfD is not necessary. The redirect will always serve a purpose so let's just discuss is redirecting for now is best. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have posted my reasons here, so you can too participate in the discussion. Since you are so keen on keeping the page, you can start by explaing why it should stay (other than the fact that you created it). --78.148.25.46 (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, I didn't create the article. I only created the redirect. I've not said the article should be kept, but I don't think AfD is necessary. You seem overly adamant about deleting and you've incorrectly added the deletion discussion template to the page multiple times via edit warring. Keep it up and you'll be blocked. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Why is it not necessary? It is a procedure regularly applied here on Wikipedia. Furthermore, all you're doing is reverting my edit, stating that I have nominated the AfD incorrectly, but you have never specified why. Maybe you could just tell me what is it that you think is wrong instead of bullying me --78.148.25.46 (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- You're edit warring but I'm the bully? I'll let others take over from here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Why is it not necessary? It is a procedure regularly applied here on Wikipedia. Furthermore, all you're doing is reverting my edit, stating that I have nominated the AfD incorrectly, but you have never specified why. Maybe you could just tell me what is it that you think is wrong instead of bullying me --78.148.25.46 (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, I didn't create the article. I only created the redirect. I've not said the article should be kept, but I don't think AfD is necessary. You seem overly adamant about deleting and you've incorrectly added the deletion discussion template to the page multiple times via edit warring. Keep it up and you'll be blocked. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have posted my reasons here, so you can too participate in the discussion. Since you are so keen on keeping the page, you can start by explaing why it should stay (other than the fact that you created it). --78.148.25.46 (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop adding back the AfD template incorrectly. AfD is not necessary. The redirect will always serve a purpose so let's just discuss is redirecting for now is best. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I read the article and there is no mention of notable things outside RPDR. The only project mentioned it's her single, which is hardly notable (it didn't chart) --78.148.25.46 (talk) 17:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
@Naraht and Onel5969: The IP editor keeps reverting, but I don't want to be accused of edit warring so do one of you mind reverting? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Another Believer, I was going to say no point in reverting, I was going to send it to AfD, but Finngall beat me to the punch. Onel5969 TT me 23:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
This seems like a valid AfD nomination to me (noting that if consensus is that she's not independently notable, then restoring the redirect is the proper result rather than outright deletion), so I have taken the liberty of completing it so that the discussion can continue there with a wider audience. --Finngall talk 20:46, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Why does Heidi have an article then? GAP did not get much critical acclaim either.
- We don't need to play the 'what about this article' game. Let's just focus on the eligibility of this specific article, please. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)