Talk:La Carmina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy[edit]

Is it relevant to include information on the strong criticism La Carmina receives from her related subculture groups? I feel the article is incomplete and gives and innacurate picture without it. -- Pinkordead (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a notable level of criticism that can be cited to reliable sources, as per WP:BLPSTYLE I would say that should definitely be included. I don't personally have much idea of who the subject is, but the article as it is represents the subject as having universal praise and acclaim (and, frankly, struck me as being either self promotion or written by a fan). If that is not an accurate representation, then please do provide some alternate viewpoints. Ibanez100 (talk) 00:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, having taken a quick look around, I did notice a lot of strong criticism from subculture groups. When I have time I might see if there's anything citable there - since this is a BLP we have to be extremely mindful of citations and avoid gossip. In the meantime I'm going to put a news release template on the article in hopes of encouraging others to help, since the article presents only the most favorable information about the subject and includes no alternate viewpoints. Ibanez100 (talk) 02:27, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While notable criticism of a subject should certainly be included in a Wikipedia article, there does not seem to be anything in a WP:RS reliable source (at least that I can find) to indicate that this subject is controversial. I am reinstating the lead that was taken out (as it stands, it's not very descriptive of what the subject does/has created or why she is notable) but will leave out some of the superlatives such as CBC's Canada's Greatest Blogs mention. I believe this should resolve the neutrality dispute as per currently available resources, so I am taking down the flag.Feather Jonah II (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on La Carmina. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]