Talk:La Nature

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I just marked this page as a possible copyvio, not because it was translated from http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature (which is free through the GFDL), but because http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature is essentially identical to http://www.gloubik.info/Revue-la-recherche/la-nature/la-nature.html. I looked at the history of http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature but could not find an older version of http://www.gloubik.info/Revue-la-recherche/la-nature/la-nature.html at archive.org to compare them. So I'm stumped as to which came first. --Butseriouslyfolks 02:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The French version indeed is more or less a direct copy from the website you identified, something I did not really notice. The English version, however, has some other elements, and I believe it is still salvageable if I find some other sources and use appropriate citations. Is this permissible? --Oreo Priest 03:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oreo Priest did a bit more digging and determined, based on this page, that Gloubik is responsible for both pages listed above. When Gloubik posted the material to fr.wikipedia, it became GFDL licensed. Thus, there is no copyvio, and I am reverting the tag I applied. --Butseriouslyfolks 03:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! i'm the author of http://www.gloubik.info/Revue-la-recherche/la-nature/la-nature.html and i copy it on http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature . there is no copyvio. -Gloubik 19:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Nature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090622202545/http://www.gloubik.info/sciences/spip.php?rubrique10 to http://www.gloubik.info/sciences/spip.php?rubrique10

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]