Talk:Labelflash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

similarities to T@2 -?![edit]

re: "DiskT@2 is a part of Labelflash technology — burning on bottom side (data side) of disc area which is not used by data is possible with any DVD±R media."

This is getting really confusing -- I am looking to understand if Labelflash, and accompanying software, will allow any printing to the UNUSED PORTION ON THE DATA SIDE of the disc, just as the DiskT@2 technology would. Does it do this or not? Dcsutherland (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution in Question[edit]

Is resolution really 1000 dpi? When importing images in Nero, their dimensions are set as if it were 100 pixels/cm (254 ppi). I have ND-4551, DVD+R disc (standard 4.7 GB), Nero 7.2 and best print quality is selected. My screen resolution is 96 ppi, and images are not tied to a particular resolution (they are JPEG, so 72 ppi by default), so this could not be the cause.


  1. I wouldn't have said it was 1000dpi. I've got a drive myself, and the detail's good, but again I wouldn't call it 1000dpi. I'll have a look around and see if I can find some other info about it. Might see if I can get a good picture of a burned CD too. —Dancraggs 00:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


A burned CD? I thought there are no LabelFlash CD-Rs yet? Or can you in fact use normal ones the way you can with normal DVDs, i.e. using data space for the picture? That would put LabelFlash in a better position as a technology, because in my view one drawback is that you cannot (yet) use it for tattooing CD-Rs - but the latter are exactly what often isn't really used up, so as a compromise it would be good if you at least could use the margin. However they really should also produce LabelFlash CD-Rs if they intend to rival LightScribe.
BTW what may be the reason for Nero not supporting LabelFlash in the US? Did HP make a special deal with Nero for the US market? Is this another superior technology (cf. e.g. BetaMax/Video 2000 vs. VHS) that is not allowed to succeed because someone feels they could make more money with a different one? It seems that LabelFlash is way like Apple and LightScribe is like Windows - the second one is not as good but more supported hence cheaper (about media, in this case) hence more demanded hence more supported etc. Edwing 15:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I found references to LabelFlash drives with 'Draft', 'Normal', and 'best' settings for DPI. Hitachi-LG (GH15F) with Draft: 307 dpi Normal: 713 dpi Best: 1829 dpi. It appears the DPI is dependent on the LabelFlash drive in use and quality setting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thraxarious (talk • contribs) 17:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LabelFlash Will Officially Be Available to US Consumers[edit]

A relative new development. Starting with Toshiba, but I'm sure others will follow, PCs with LabelFlash technology will be sold in the US market. Also, the special media will start being made available, as mentioned by an announcement last Friday on the LabelFlash site. --130.127.121.188 00:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for the tone about the Ahead Nero software differences between US and UK customers, this is typically because of licensing, its possible Ahead had to license the technology for distribution in different markets. It is possible Nero did not wish to pay a yearly license fee without suitable hardware in the US market to support it. The tone could be adjusted to reflect this if someone has actual information regarding this. Thraxarious (talk) 17:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding example image of LabelFlash[edit]

Hello, I was thinking of adding the image "Labelflash WikipediaLogo.jpg" from the Commons to this page. Is that all right with everybody? Thomas Yen (talk) 02:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LabelFlash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LabelFlash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Labelflash&oldid=1169751548"