Talk:Lakehurst Mall

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion[edit]

What construction has occured at Lakehurst lately? I know there's a Wal Mart supercenter going in there and the Service Merchandise building will become the new location of the Sundance Saloon night club.--Jon Revelle 01:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Off Topic?[edit]

Why was the "Crumbling Perimeter" section tagged as off topic? The places mentioned were all built to service Lakehurst and I think it relates to the mall due to them still falling apart while the mall was demolished and the land revived. Would a separate article work better?--jonrev 01:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's because the article is about the mall. This is starting to go beyond the mall and into the time and space beyond the mall. I'm inclined to remove the section entirely. The mall is gone. Its story is complete. It's been demolished and a new structure has been built in its place. Any new developments should go in a new article. Likewise, off-the-property developments independent of the mall are not appropriate for an article about the mall itself.

In a nutshell, you've got to draw the line somewhere, and I'm drawing it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Name[edit]

Lakehurst was not just a mall, it was an entire complex of shopping and living, and all the signs read Lakehurst, not Lakehurst Mall. If nobody objects then I would like to rename this article.--jonrev (talk) 04:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Objection. One must draw the line somewhere. Most malls generate a good bit of development all around them, and if included, the article starts to sprawl faster than a suburb. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lakehurst Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080118184045/http://www.freewebs.com/lakehurst/index.htm to http://www.freewebs.com/lakehurst/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]