A fact from Landing Masonry Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
'Landing, New Jersey' is in the prose, so I removed it from the see also section.
It would be better if Lake Hopatcong was incorporated into the prose, but I'll leave that to you, as I guess it's beyond a GA review.
We provide a coord link in the article so people can chose their own map site. I have therefore removed the external link to Google. (fixed)
'right-of-way' needed to be disambiguated. (fixed)
Refs 4 through 7 and 10 are photographs. I don't understand how they can be used to cite pretty much most of the early history.
Placing on hold until the referencing is sorted out. Arsenikk(talk) 09:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
References 4-7 are physically describing the station design, which are where the citations are placed. Citation 10 is basically showing the completed bridge. (Also I hate coordinates with a passion).Mitch32(We the people in orderto form a more perfect union.) 12:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For instance, "The original bridge over the Morris Canal and the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad's mainline through Landing, New Jersey existed at least before 1895." is referenced to this image. How does this image in itself prove the year 1895? Ref 6 proves nothing of "The new bridge was open by 1910, and was designed as a two-lane automobile bridge." neither year nor that it is an automobile bridge, nor that it has two lanes. Arsenikk(talk) 12:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That site is on the verge of not being RS, and using images the way you do is on the verge of being OR. Because this is "only" GA I'll let it pass if you reference the site (for the years of the images), but I would have opposed this method at FAR. Arsenikk(talk) 17:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked for a second opinion, since I am rather uncertain of the borders of OR in this issue. Perhaps a second pair of eyes will help out. Arsenikk(talk) 17:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
According to the site, "We're a voluntary community public service, started by a resident of Landing." There is no statement establishing any inherent academic credibility or stating that it is part of the city government. Please tell me if I have overlooked something. Arsenikk(talk) 21:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bottom of page: "Landing, New Jersey is part of the Municipality of Roxbury Township. A link to the "official" website of Roxbury Township can be found on our "Links" page." - Mitch32(We the people in orderto form a more perfect union.) 21:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, all it is saying is that the settlement of Landing is within the municipality of Roxbury. The bottom of the main page says: "This website is a voluntary public service of LandingNewJersey.com, a private, non-commercial community service." That is definitely not a municipal site. It may be RS, but then there needs to be some evidence of that. I'm off to bed now (it's past midnight here), but I can peek back in the morning (to tired to do this now). Arsenikk(talk) 22:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there somewhere else I should be looking in Taber? In the station list section Hopatcong (p. 742) and Lake Hopatcong (p. 746) are briefly discussed, but he merely says that a new building was built 1910-1911. There's no specific date nor monetary amount. Mackensen(talk) 22:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]