This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
These are both on the same topic, but one is essentially an appeal for the other. It would be more appropriate to merge them together, since they are so closely related Mako001 (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The first is a redirect to here. There is nothing to merge. I removed the merge tag. Polyamorph (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think Mako meant to propose merger with De Valence v Langley Fox Building Partnership (W). I agree that the two articles should be merged, and I have tagged De Valence v Langley Fox Building Partnership (W) with Template:Mergeto. I have no preference whether this article on the appeal is merged into the other article on the Witwatersrand division decision, or whether the other article on the Witwatersrand division decision is merged into this article on the appeal. I am not sure if we have a naming convention for this kind of article. James500 (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
