Talk:Lansweeper

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 October 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Ls.EsbenD (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
Nimachar (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Saschke69 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
BooBoo9000 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

}}

Article prune[edit]

Given connected contributors seem to have respectfully ceased to add to the article and added a COI I may attempt to prune it as an independent particularly rebasing on some of the newer non primary references. I'll probably switch to WP:LDR as it is a technique I use which helps me manage citations in an article rescue and switch back afterwards if anyone needs me to if it survives. If that gives anyone problems let me know. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have worked over references and belive there is enough WP:RS for article to survive. I will now begin to prune/re-write the article as seems fit. I know I will start but pruning some bits I don't want to include .. I will then pause and then begin to prune/re-write some more. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:21, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My current thought is I will create new sections and at the appropriate point remove the previous ones, and also re-write the lede at some point, sourcing throughout. That should eliminate the paid editing concerns. (There may be normal) disputes with my editing. This is likely a couple of elapsed days, possibly longer. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In order for me to be comfortable for a (successful) keep vote at AfD I feel like I have to do a hard prune ... but retaining key references. If those with COI them wish changes there is the Wikipedia:Edit requests procedure. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Template:Undisclosed paid[edit]

I believe I have reworked out all content that has been contributed by paid edited (perhaps bar say trivia in Infobox such as version number). Per WP:CLEANUPTAG and Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems these are not meant to be a permanent shame mark on an article or topic. I therefore believe as at Old revision of Lansweeper

The Template:Undisclosed paid should be removed.
The connected contributor can be marked as checked as no connected contributor content remains at

In may be in doing so it is felt my good faith contributions are for instance non neutral and perhaps in good faith to someone the resulting content looks like an advert or by point of view was non neutral in which case alternative tagging might be considered. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:TC the template has been removed as effectively eliminated. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits from connected editors[edit]

Edits from users who per WP:DUCK may have a connection with subject will be reverted. However requests on this talkpage for changes will be respected, if necessary by WP:REQUESTEDIT. For example [1]. (And please note the chance of any argument to get Template:Undisclosed paid removed would be scuppered if that edit made by that editor were allowed to remain) Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]