Talk:Laramie Formation

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Geology

	Geology portal Talk:Laramie Formation is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Paleobiota help[edit]

Code[edit]

This section contains pre-made code that can be copy and pasted into articles containing paleobiota tables. To save space, not all of the code is visible, additional code can be found by simply viewing this section's edit page.

Premade rowspans:

| rowspan="2" |

| rowspan="3" |

| rowspan="4" |

| rowspan="5" |

| rowspan="6" |

| rowspan="7" |

Replacement headings for "Presence" column

! Location
! Stratigraphic position
! Material

Replacement headings for "Taxa" column

Cell background colors[edit]

The background colors of the cells are a means to communicate the relevant organism's taxonomic status.

Color key

Taxon	Reclassified taxon	Taxon falsely reported as present	Dubious taxon or junior synonym	Ichnotaxon	Ootaxon	Morphotaxon

Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; ~~crossed out~~ taxa are discredited.

Red for reclassified and preoccupied

|style="background:#fbdddb;" |

Purple for taxa falsely reported as present:

|style="background:#f3e9f3;" |

Dark grey for discredited taxa:

|style="background:#E6E6E6;" |

Peach for Ichnotaxa:

|style="background:#FEF6E4;" |

Light blue for Ootaxa:

|style="background:#E3F5FF;" |

Light green for Morphotaxa:

|style="background:#D1FFCF;" |

Question about Laramie Formation and possible extention to Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops range[edit]

Currently, the Triceratops range is from 68 to 66 Ma. However, this page states that the age of the Laramie Formation is 69 to 68 Ma, and the Triceratops specimens in this formation are the oldest known. Could this extend the range of Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus, or are they only found at the upper part of the Laramie Formation?

"Skull of Triceratops from the Laramie Formation. This skull may be the oldest known for the genus"

"The palynomorphs indicate an early Maastrichtian age (68-69 mya), which is supported by magnetostratigraphy."

--Paleomario66 (talk) 16:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been suggested that the Laramie Triceratops skull may not be a Triceratops at all, but rather an Eotriceratops or an Ojoceratops, due to the presence of a broad nostril flange. The Tyrannosaurus fossils, however, are still believed to belong to that genus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.71.166.188 (talk) 06:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]