Talk:Latent Image (Star Trek: Voyager)

Star Trek High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Please provide any citations per verifiability and reliable sources.
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference ideas for Latent Image (Star Trek: Voyager)

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Wolff, Ellen (1999-02-01), "Blood and Guts: Star Trek Voyager Builds Character from the Bones Up", Millimeter, Penton (company), archived from the original on 2010-02-13

July 2005[edit]

This article makes no sense. It is poorley written, and doesn'e even specify what program it came from. (7/12/05) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doughboy (talk • contribs) 01:59, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Use the four tildes bra. The article actually states that it is from a Star Trek:Voyager episode. However, you are correct in that it is poorly written. Dessydes 01:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vita Nuova Translation?[edit]

As best I can tell the Dante quote the Doctor used in this episode is not from the popular translations of La Vita Nuova. Does anyone know if the writing staff customized the quote so it would work better in the episode or if there is a tranlation of La Vita Nuova that matches this line? I prefer it over the two widely-printed versions available. -(11/06/2006) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.160.50 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody put in a sentence recently indicating the writing staff mistranslated it, but didn't reference which English translation they're using as the source. I've put up a {{fact}} for now. Wl219 13:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ST-VOY Latent Image.jpg[edit]

Image:ST-VOY Latent Image.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an episode summary page goes, this one is really WITHOUT major issue[edit]

This episode summary is structured like so many of the others for the ST Voyager series. I am deleting the "multiple issues" template messages.

Anyone curious as to any further justification need look no further than any of the other episode summary pages for Star Trek Voyager episodes. Shoot, just click on the previous or subsequent Season 5 episode summaries; this one looks a whole lot like those!

"This article relies too much on references to primary sources. (April 2011)
- Summaries of episodes of minor TV shows can only really be spruced up by information from primary sources. It's not as if courses or analytical journal entries or studies are taught/funded to look at them from a secondary distance.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2013)
- There are only so many things that can be cited for verification when it comes to a 90s TV drama.
This article consists almost entirely of a plot summary. It should be expanded to provide more balanced coverage that includes real-world context. (July 2013)"
- A page dedicated to one episode is almost entirely a plot summary? No way! How dare that page mainly summarize the episode when...that's it main purpose?

- Xanderox (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Kim was shot second; therefore he had the better chance for survival. Otherwise his program might have chosen Jetal "women and children first". Drsruli (talk) 14:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]