Talk:launchd

Import AFP document[edit]

After a discussion with Josh Wisenbaker I imported much of his article on launchd: http://www.afp548.com/article.php?story=20050620071558293

It was already under the CC liceanse non-commercial and share alike. He quickly agreed to dual license it under the GFDL. This can be seen both at the above site at the end of the article and on with his email exchange with me. I have archived them in two places and here as well:

~ Dear Josh, The Wikipedia page for Launchd is rather skimpy. Would you mind if I imported some of your article on the subject? This would, of course, entail changing the license to GFDL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launchd

Thank you, Zach

Hi Zach,

Although the link seems to of vanished from the site everything at AFP548.com is under noncommercial-sharealike Creative Commons license. Feel free to publish any part of it with an Attribution to the site.

'seems to HAVE vanished'. Thanks TPT.

If that's too restrictive then let me know and we can get it worked out. I'm just happy to spread the info as far as possible.

Josh ~

Although there is speculation that the nc-sa cc license is compatible with the GFDL it is ambiguous. Since you wrote it, and I am assuming you did not up take anyother nc-sa cc works, you can simply re- release it under the GFDL, under which Wikipedia publishes it's works. While there is some problems with it fixes will happen in newer revisions. I would suggest you dual license the content, that would allow importation into Wikipedia without you having to provide an approval each time.

The GFDL: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/fdl.html

Thank you, big fan of the site. Zach

Thanks for the link, I'll get together with Joel on it for the whole site, but in the case of this single article feel free to import whatever you need. I am the sole author of it and it does not contain anyone else's work. I'll add a note to the launchd article that it is also covered under the GFDL.

Thanks, Josh ~

Clean up[edit]

This page is marked for clean up. What are some suggestions for how this page could be improved? – Mipadi 17:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Huge change"?[edit]

The article claims that launchd being PID 1 is "a huge change for Mac OS X, and Unix-like operating systems in general". If you're arguing that the change from the models of the world provided by the two flavors of init to the model of the world provided by launchd is a huge change, one could argue that it is, but it's not specific to step 2 - that change is in what happens after step 3. The page for init says that it "is the program on Unix and Unix-like systems which spawns all other processes" and that "it runs as a daemon and typically has PID 1"; both of those are true of launchd as well. Yes, the name changed, but that, in and of itself, isn't a huge change. Guy Harris 20:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've gotten rid of that claim.

% ed bsd/kern/kern_exec.c
/init_program_name/s;/init;/launchd;p
w
q

is not a "huge change". Guy Harris 04:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section[edit]

Where are these claims coming from? It's mostly about possible disadvantages compared to System V and sounds like that's what was previously used by Mac OS X. But Mac OS X had no System V and/or runlevels in previous versions. Therefor the given points discuss why launchd might not be used by Linux or other Unices, but they are not important for Mac OS X. --85.126.128.10 19:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This isn’t the Apple Developer Wiki. No reason not to include info from other perspectives, although that section certainly needs some cleanup before it’s added back. —Wulf (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible replacement for the homepage[edit]

The following can be a replacement for the now dead homepage link: http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/launchd/launchd-442.26.2/ http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man8/launchd.8.html 95.95.186.86 (talk) 16:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Launchd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Document "KeepAlive"[edit]

It's mentioned in the table for "OnDemand" but no further information is given.

User5910 (talk) 14:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]