Talk:Lauren Barwick/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Fram (talk · contribs) 08:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline, completely. I don't really care about the formal GA process; but this is comes hot on the heels of a previous GA nomination you produced and which was incorrectly accepted, and which I reversed a few hours later. Walter Wu, where you didn't even correct the errors pointed out in the GA decline. Now, looking at this one, it is totally not ready for GA.
You don't even have her Paralympic medals right. If you can't get the most basic fact about her sporting career correct, I will not bother with doing a point-by-point review of the GA rules.
Take it slow, bring it up to C- and B-class, wait a while, get a peer review, ... First of all, get the facts straight, check them, double check them. If you notice that you are not up to the task of creating articles of GA standards, don't nominate them, but do the best you can and try to get other interested editors involved who may improve and expand the articles.
It would perhaps also be better if you didn't judge any other articles for GA standards, if you are this blatantly wrong in your own articles. Fram (talk) 08:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)