Talk:Lautaro (volcano)

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile Low‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Google Scholar

A fact from Lautaro (volcano) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the position of the volcano Lautaro was only clarified thanks to aerial imagery?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lautaro (volcano).

Wikipedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lautaro (volcano). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927212607/http://www.americanalpineclub.org/AAJO/pdfs/1974/191_bolivia_chile_argentina_aaj1974.pdf to http://www.americanalpineclub.org/AAJO/pdfs/1974/191_bolivia_chile_argentina_aaj1974.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 15:58, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the position of Lautaro volcano was only clarified thanks to aerial imagery? Source: De ese modo se llegó al 28 de diciembre de 1959 que fue cuando se resolvió el antiguo misterio, gracias a la obser-vación del piloto Alfonso Cuadrado, a bordo de un avión cuadrimotor Douglas DC6B de Lan Chile, realizada mientras volaba en la ruta Santiago-Puerto Montt-Punta Arenas. Avistó entonces un volcán en erupción, actividad que fotografi ó, registrando además la posición exacta del foco eruptivo
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Trent (1796)

5x expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 13:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lautaro (volcano); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Nice little article, decent hook (though you could consider mentioning that the volcano is in Chile). I can't read Spanish, but I'm happy to accept the source in good faith. Newly five-times expanded. But you'll need to review another nomination before this can appear on the main page. Please do say if I'm wrong! Josh Milburn (talk) 09:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@J Milburn: No, you weren't wrong. Added a QPQ. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great; then this is good to go. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see in the article "The 1959 eruption was observed from aircraft, clarifying the position of the volcano". I cannot read the source but will AGF. Bruxton (talk) 15:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probable typo in Eruption History[edit]

The article states that potassium-argon dating has yielded evidence of an eruption *30 000 ± 73 000 years. I looked at the source listed, but couldn't find the reference. Munchyhunch (talk) 05:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A bit hard to search, but Ages for these samples range from 161±11 ka to 30±73 ka is in the source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]