Talk:Lava Canyon Falls

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Revision[edit]

This page needs some major revision. Lava Canyon was first and foremost not formed by the 1980 eruption and all of the waterfalls within it did exist prior to the eruption. The bedrock formations were not as exposed and the falls weren't accessible prior to the construction of the trail system post-eruption.
Bryan Swan | World Waterfall Database (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think by reading the info present in the article, the author(s) (including me) have probably tried to present the fact that the falls were re-formed recently, but just didn't mention that the falls existed in the past before the mudflows, lahars, etc. buried the canyon. In the entry on Waterfalls Northwest, you wrote this: "canyon that lay covered by dirt, rock and forest for 1800 years". So I probably interpreted that to be that the falls themselves did not exist, but the rock formations did.

Also, you mentioned that "the Muddy River re-occupied the canyon" so that was what made me think that there was no water feeding the falls prior to the eruption, and so therefore they did not exist. Sorry, though, if the misinterpreted info has been lying around for some time... themaee ^talk 00:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lava Canyon Falls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717042424/http://www.thewaterfallcompanion.com/?page=Waterfall&id=254 to http://www.thewaterfallcompanion.com/?page=Waterfall&id=254

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]