Talk:Law Enforcement Conduct Commission

Australia: New South Wales / Law / Crime Low‑importance

	Australia portal Law Enforcement Conduct Commission is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Proposed merge of Inspector of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission into Law Enforcement Conduct Commission[edit]

not enough for a separate article DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom. --John B123 (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I created that article on the model of the existing Inspector of the Police Integrity Commission. And there are several articles mentioning things this office has done: Visentin, Lisa (2020-01-23). "Police watchdog commissioner sacked after complaint investigation". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2021-04-07. The complaint was investigated by assistant inspector of the LECC, Bruce McClintock...{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link), Thompson, Angus (2020-02-25). "Strip search inquiry revived amid questions over watchdog's future". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2021-04-07. Asked what needed to happen to stabilise the agency, Terry Buddin, SC, the Inspector of the LECC, said...{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link), "NSW police oversight chief to step aside". The Australian. 24 Dec 2019. Retrieved 2021-04-07. The investigation was carried out by the LECC's independent inspector, Terry Buddin SC, who delivered his findings to the NSW government...{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link). I generally think that since the OILECC is a separate and independent agency from the LECC, not part of LECC–which is part of the legal design of the whole scheme, OILECC being independent of LECC ensures a perception of independence–it ought to have its own article. I think, as a general rule, if we have two independent government agencies, they each ought to have their own article. I also think one item per an agency works better for the Wikidata-Wikipedia integrationMr248 (talk) 20:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - clearly no reason for this very short stub article. Can be handled better as part of the other short article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]