Talk:Law on Abolishment of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Azerbaijan Low‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Artsakh Low‑importance

	Law on Abolishment of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poor decision[edit]

Boy, did that backfire... Chances are that Nagorno-Karabakh would probably have remained part of Azerbaijan if they wouldn't have done that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VulpesVulpes42 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Law on Abolishment of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424015234/http://e-qanun.az/print.php?internal=view&target=1&docid=6783&doctype=0 to http://e-qanun.az/print.php?internal=view&target=1&docid=6783&doctype=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who drew the borders of the NKAO?[edit]

I think this is an unfair statement that pushes a biased POV. More on this discussion the talk page of the NKAO (the same statement is included there). Kentronhayastan (talk)

Relevance to the Category:Organisation of Islamic Cooperation[edit]

I noticed that the Category:Organisation of Islamic Cooperation has been added to this article. I'm wondering if this category is relevant to the content of the article. Could anyone provide some insight or justification for this categorization? Thanks! Ainty Painty (talk) 09:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]