This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
I dont see how the 2015 cage-free egg commitment that Starbucks has walked back is relevant to an article on the new CEO who just came to Starbucks in September 2022. Can you edit to include facts that tie it together? 47.153.64.236 (talk) 15:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Narasimhan was not even at Reckitt when the "Criticisms and controversies" happened[edit]
The two scandals were at Reckitt's South Korean unit and happened in 2011 and in 2014 (per the citation [1]). Narasimhan wasn't even at Reckitt until September 2019. Vaughnsy (talk) 01:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and removed that subsection since no one has objected. The resignation subsection also appears to make no sense either. It wasn't a controversy; per the citation [2] he wanted to move back to the U.S. with his family, and the Starbucks offer gave him that opportunity. Also, per the citation in the rest of the article [3], Schultz apparently wanted him to start as soon as possible because Starbucks effectively had no CEO at that point (only Schultz as interim CEO). I am going to go ahead and remove that subsection as well. Vaughnsy (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
