Talk:Lee Li Lian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy[edit]

Somebody on the Worker's Party page commented that 'The NCMP seat cannot be given to another opposition party. Has to follow parliamentary rules for the NCMP seat.' I agree wholeheartedly.

Imho, precisely, because there are parliamentary rules, if Lee Lilian was one of the foremost losers, the rules say she has to take it, or simply never have stood as a candidate in the first place! If you get semi-elected like Lee Lilian, yet quit the job before you even start work, you are creating problems for your employer. And your employer here is hardly Ajisen Ramen that hires you as a waitress or Workers' Party that hired you as a public face, your employer here is the Singapore Parliament and the electorate including nearly 20% that bothered voting the Workers' Party. If you throw in the towel in public, Lee Lilian is simply the cause of the dispute in the first place, if you don't penalise her and her child whom was the excuse of her rejection, we are already slighting the Singapore Parliamentary rules and regulations. In fact you should bar Workers' Party and Lee Lilian from running for SMCs in future since they are unwilling to honour their voters by pushing the blame on nearly 70% of the country that voted somebody else!

175.156.115.229 (talk) 05:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Li Lian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]